data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4a2/bd4a272ac1faa56c459d87ed8c38599edd4e019a" alt=""
All other things (like price and storage space) being equal, given a choice in a perfect world, would you rather have paperbacks in your library? Or hardcovers? And why?
I waver on this from time to time, but I would have to say overall I prefer trade-size paperbacks. They're bigger than the mass market paperbacks, so they give some of the sturdier feel of hardcovers, but they are easier to haul around and I like the look of them all lined up on the shelves. I find hardcovers cumbersome most of the time, but, that being said, there are some books in my personal library that have merited the purchase of a hardcover either due to the books themselves, or the fact that they are part of a series that I like the looks of. For example, I have the Everyman's Library hardcovers of The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Aeneid and The Divine Comedy.
Play along with Booking Through Thursday here!
It's almost Friday!
Lezlie
4 comments:
I hadn't thought of trade paperbacks. They do look tidy, all lined up :)
Yeah, good point on the trade paperbacks. I do try to buy those if I can...
I shoulda remembered the trade paperbacks, too. I cetainly have enough of them. They usually have the best covers, too.
Why is it so difficut to choose? I want both!
Format
Post a Comment